Comments on: OpenLDAP blown away? http://blog.fupps.com/2006/04/04/openldap-blown-away/ my animals and other friends Tue, 16 Mar 2010 10:16:31 +0100 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Jan-Piet Mens http://blog.fupps.com/2006/04/04/openldap-blown-away/comment-page-1/#comment-193 Jan-Piet Mens Wed, 05 Apr 2006 07:42:18 +0000 http://blog.fupps.com/?p=368#comment-193 @Marty: the link is correct; it just sometimes loads and sometimes it doesn't. (Is it powered by FDS? :-) ) @Marty: the link is correct; it just sometimes loads and sometimes it doesn't. (Is it powered by FDS? :-) )

]]> By: Quanah Gibson-Mount http://blog.fupps.com/2006/04/04/openldap-blown-away/comment-page-1/#comment-192 Quanah Gibson-Mount Tue, 04 Apr 2006 22:03:52 +0000 http://blog.fupps.com/?p=368#comment-192 Hi Jan-Piet, You can look at: http://www.symas.com/10k-cdsvnds.shtml For a comparison between OpenLDAP 2.2/CDS 2 and Netscape 6.21. It is on my to-do list to do a benchmark of FDS as compared to CDS 3. I will note that those benchmarks were done with DirectoryMark, which is not as capable as the new software I'm using to do benchmarks with (slamd). Keep an eye on the: http://www.symas.com/benchmark.shtml for updates as they become available. Regards, Quanah Hi Jan-Piet,

You can look at:

http://www.symas.com/10k-cdsvnds.shtml

For a comparison between OpenLDAP 2.2/CDS 2 and Netscape 6.21. It is on my to-do list to do a benchmark of FDS as compared to CDS 3. I will note that those benchmarks were done with DirectoryMark, which is not as capable as the new software I'm using to do benchmarks with (slamd).

Keep an eye on the:

http://www.symas.com/benchmark.shtml

for updates as they become available.

Regards,
Quanah

]]> By: Marty Heyman http://blog.fupps.com/2006/04/04/openldap-blown-away/comment-page-1/#comment-191 Marty Heyman Tue, 04 Apr 2006 21:43:08 +0000 http://blog.fupps.com/?p=368#comment-191 Jan-Piet, we really doubt that that claim can be made based on performance. The most recent performance runs we've made comparing the Netscape last release to OpenLDAP 2.2 (if I remember correctly) showed OpenLDAP did very well against Netscape. That data is still up at our Web site somewhere. And I don't think Red Had has had time or energy to do any significant performance work on it yet. Our recent benchmarking hasn't included comparisons like this. But it's been on BIG directories and I'd say OpenLDAP's doing REALLY well. Sounds like a fan-boy raving without facts. BTW ... the link is busted so I couldn't go read the original post. Jan-Piet, we really doubt that that claim can be made based on performance. The most recent performance runs we've made comparing the Netscape last release to OpenLDAP 2.2 (if I remember correctly) showed OpenLDAP did very well against Netscape. That data is still up at our Web site somewhere. And I don't think Red Had has had time or energy to do any significant performance work on it yet. Our recent benchmarking hasn't included comparisons like this. But it's been on BIG directories and I'd say OpenLDAP's doing REALLY well.
Sounds like a fan-boy raving without facts. BTW … the link is busted so I couldn't go read the original post.

]]>