Comments on: Managing Bacula deployment onto Windows http://blog.fupps.com/2009/10/16/managing-bacula-deployment-onto-windows/ my animals and other friends Tue, 16 Mar 2010 10:16:31 +0100 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Jan-Piet Mens » Bacula 3.0.2 on ReadyNAS NV+ http://blog.fupps.com/2009/10/16/managing-bacula-deployment-onto-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-2424 Jan-Piet Mens » Bacula 3.0.2 on ReadyNAS NV+ Sat, 31 Oct 2009 08:28:42 +0000 http://blog.fupps.com/?p=3156#comment-2424 [...] recently mentioned to Stefan Rubner that the Bacula network backup toolchain would be a really great addition to the [...] [...] recently mentioned to Stefan Rubner that the Bacula network backup toolchain would be a really great addition to the [...]

]]> By: Jan-Piet Mens » Is a client workstation using Wireless? http://blog.fupps.com/2009/10/16/managing-bacula-deployment-onto-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-2410 Jan-Piet Mens » Is a client workstation using Wireless? Wed, 21 Oct 2009 19:57:13 +0000 http://blog.fupps.com/?p=3156#comment-2410 [...] This is a problem, when you require unique addresses, for example, when deploying Bacula clients. [...] [...] This is a problem, when you require unique addresses, for example, when deploying Bacula clients. [...]

]]> By: Jan-Piet Mens http://blog.fupps.com/2009/10/16/managing-bacula-deployment-onto-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-2407 Jan-Piet Mens Sat, 17 Oct 2009 08:11:12 +0000 http://blog.fupps.com/?p=3156#comment-2407 Yes, I'd thought of doing that too, but the problem is that you a) either use a single password for all FDs, or b) generate unique passwords, then having to "manage" all the bacula-fd.conf (which went where). Yes, I'd thought of doing that too, but the problem is that you a) either use a single password for all FDs, or b) generate unique passwords, then having to "manage" all the bacula-fd.conf (which went where).

]]> By: Dan Langille http://blog.fupps.com/2009/10/16/managing-bacula-deployment-onto-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-2406 Dan Langille Sat, 17 Oct 2009 03:14:30 +0000 http://blog.fupps.com/?p=3156#comment-2406 Sounds good. What I've done is the reverse: assembled the bacula-fd.conf centrally and deployed that. But I think your solution is simpler. Sounds good.

What I've done is the reverse: assembled the bacula-fd.conf centrally and deployed that. But I think your solution is simpler.

]]>